Why the Current Debate
on Socialism in Nepal is So Much Hot Air
The constitution of Nepal has envisioned a
prosperous and socialist Nepal. However, vital sectors connected to the economy
and public life have been assigned to the private sector.
https://thewire.in/world/nepal-socialism-congress-communist-party
A debate on socialism has been underway in the Left circles
of Nepal for some time now. Friends from the Nepali Congress too occasionally
become part of this “chorus” on socialism.
Had it been an academic debate among the scholars or the
politicians for that matter, it would have gone unnoticed as debates and
deliberations are an inalienable part of the academic world. But when such
discussions are organised by fora affiliated to the ruling Communist party
where senior Communist party leaders deliver key note address, focused on
building socialism in Nepal, the event becomes all the more important.
Socialism is a philosophy, and political and economic theory aimed at
the overall development of humanity. Even the arch rivals of socialism cannot
ignore the welfare state, which is the principal part of socialism. “From each
according to his ability and to each according to his work” is a key economic
slogan of socialism. Other defining features of socialism are characterised by
free availability of basic needs of the people, such as education, health and
housing from the state.
Also read: Despite Stirrings, Revival of Nepal’s Monarchy and Hindu
Character Unlikely
The constitution of Nepal has envisioned a socialism-oriented prosperous
Nepal. However, all the vital sectors of the economy and public life have been
assigned to the private sector.
A futile discussion
Laying the foundation of socialism over a tattered social and economic
base, as in Nepal, is simply inconceivable. Ironically, the leaders have not
refrained from debating on the topic of building socialism in Nepal, ignoring
the gloomy situation in the country for which corrupt bureaucrats and
politicians are solely responsible.
Rather than engaging in a futile debate on socialism and selling the
dreams of “prosperous Nepal”, it would have been better had the party leaders
channelised their energy to transform the corrupt and dilapidated polity and
fulfil the remaining task of nation-building.
In this choreography of “building a socialist society”,
senior-most leaders of the Nepal Communist Party (NCP) and leaders of the
Nepali Congress (NC) take part occasionally with equal zeal. Those are the same
set of NCP and NC leaders who at one time or the other had made it to the top
level of the government. By virtue of their position, they were fully armed
with powers and prerogatives to change the status quo. But they did nothing to
transform the state of affairs, nor do they seem interested to effect changes
in the corrupt system.
The irony of the present-day “federal democratic republic” is that its
rulers have adopted a policy of exporting able-bodied and able-minded human
resources leading to the flight of almost half of the working-age population
abroad. They have entirely washed their hands of generating employment in the
country and preventing the exodus of human capital. It is a self-defeating
exercise to debate building socialism in Nepal by sending half of the human
capital abroad, and overlooking the bitter fact that the state is being run on
remittances.
The momentum of Nepali renaissance squandered
The discourse beginning since the 1950s, the period which could also be
termed as the Nepali renaissance, has always moved in the wrong direction. In
1951, Nepali people achieved some democratic rights, such as freedom of
assembly and expression and party formation. But on the other hand, some of the
members of cabinet would demand Indian Army deployment to curb the K.I. Singh
uprising, Khukuri Dal revolt and the peasants uprising led by Bhim Datt Pant.
The leaders in Delhi would issue a
statement that the northern border of India is extended up to the Himalayas.
Delhi and its advisors played a decisive role in the formation of ministries in
Nepal, drafting of the constitution and the formulation of development plans.
This meant that Nepal has had to traverse a long journey to become a sovereign
and independent nation.
When King Mahendra dissolved the parliament in 1960, Tanka
Prasad Acharya, a supporter of leftist ideology, became the prime minister for
a brief period. Mahendra strived hard to make Nepal independent but he did not
succeed completely.
Over the past seven decades, Nepal has experimented with several political
systems. Some may find it amazing, but the fact is that Nepal could not become
an independent nation, not only in the political and economic sense, but also
in terms of geographical sovereignty even after seven-decade-old tumultuous
struggle in which thousands of people sacrificed their lives. One does not need
to go very far to understand this, only one simple example would suffice: the
border with India has been left open.
One is free to interpret this situation,
but the real meaning is that by keeping the border open with India, Nepal has
been virtually merged into India. The “merger” was beneficial to the British as
well as to the Ranas to facilitate the hassle-free movement of fighter youths
and high-quality timber from Nepal. But even after the dawn of democracy, the
borders have been left open.
Reworking of priorities required
To talk about building socialism in Nepal by leaving the border open
with a very close but extremely difficult neighbour is utterly ridiculous. Open
and unsecured border with a powerful country, which has one of the largest
economy and military force, where the forces have a mentality of “India
extending from the Indian ocean to the Himalayas” has been ingrained, is
strategically dangerous for a weak nation. Moreover, India’s past history of
the annexation of Sikkim and the creation of Bangladesh and its aggressive
gestures still today towards its small neighbours make the situation all the
more vulnerable.
Also read: Nepal Redraws Political Map by Incorporating Three
Disputed Areas With India
Making the borders secure, maintaining a
record of foreigners and fellow citizens entering and exiting the country
through a passport and visa regime are the primary and fundamental duties of
any government. Without fulfilling these primary duties, a nation can never
attain the status of a sovereign nation. Without fulfilling primary tasks for
the people, the talk of socialist “paradise” is just day-dreaming.
If the very people on whose shoulder lies the responsibility of making
Nepal a separate and independent country by abrogating unequal treaties,
regulation of the border with India and undoing the humiliating tradition of
Gorkha recruitment, shut their eyes to these stark realities and engage
themselves in platitudes of building socialism in Nepal, it makes no sense. It
is not wise to waste time talking about a PhD without clearing a high school
examination. Before talking about tying the knot, let us first decide who is
going to marry whom.
Laxman Pant is a central committee member of the Nepal Communist Party.
